While We Wait 2, What Happened To The Chinese Deal? (CYDY)

Another day, and still we wait. For over a month The NaDDir* and his klown krew at everyone’s favorite reverse-merger pink sheet Coronacrapper, Cytodyn (CYDY), have denied the world the top line results from the CD12 study of loserlimab for Severe-to-Critical Chinese Coronavirus Disease. To while away the hours, today the curmudgeons at BuyersStrike! HQ continue our fun look back at some of the other developments Cytodyn has promised and never delivered.

A little over a year ago, on the 12th of February 2020, during the earliest stages of its pivot from HIV shitstock to a Coronacrapper, Cytodyn issued a press release (read it here) trumpeting a Letter of Intent for the joint development and licensing of loserlimab in China:

With all things Cytodyn, the reality appears to be very different than the headlines. As always, the first step in verifying anything in a corporate press release is to look for an associated 8k filing with the SEC. Remember, no 8k filing means the supposedly important news is actually completely immaterial. Immaterial is lawyer-speak for what in the real world is called utter and complete bullshit. Sure enough, CYDY never issued an 8k about this Chinese deal. You can find all of the 8k filed by the company in 2020 right here, there is nothing about any LOI with Longen China Group.

There is nothing about Longen China Group in Cytodyn’s annual report filed on Form 10K (read it here) either. Not even a further press release from the company. What about all of the Wuhan flu long-hoooolers in China that Cytodyn could be “saving” right this minute? With the exception of Cytodyn’s own press release, and articles regurgitating that same press release, multiple web searches reveal nothing else on Longen China Group and its supposed subsidiaries. Pretty much all we know about Longen, is from this bizarre blurb at the bottom of the Cytodyn press release:

And some people wonder why we lovingly call Cytodyn management the Klown Krew?

*Spelled thusly for a double dose of that sweet sweet stock pimpin’

THE CONTENT CONTAINED IN THIS BLOG REPRESENTS ONLY THE OPINIONS OF THE AUTHOR. THE AUTHOR MAY HOLD EITHER LONG OR SHORT POSITIONS IN SECURITIES OF VARIOUS COMPANIES DISCUSSED IN THE BLOG. THIS COMMENTARY IN NO WAY CONSTITUTES INVESTMENT ADVICE, AND SHOULD NEVER BE RELIED ON IN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION, EVER. THIS BLOG IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF BUSINESS: ALL INQUIRIES WILL BE IGNORED. THE CONTENT HEREIN IS INTENDED SOLELY FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT OF THE READER, AND THE AUTHOR.

One comment

  1. It’s amazing how less and less and less people take you seriously, I only look to just jerk you around and waste your time, you sound like you’re 12 years old in your shitty reports, you’re not a journalist, you’re a big baby who embarrassed yourself and screwed up about dr Kelly selling shares when he didn’t, you lost all credibility and you call a life saving drug names, it’s amazing how an adult doesn’t know that when talk like a 12 year old and call names thst people stop reading, no facts, no links ever. Sad SOB and the silence of cytodyn is killing you because you know the SEC And FDA asked them to shut it before they give EUA. You know how this works numbnuts. It’s all about to end soon and I promise it’s gonna be very painful.

    [Welcome back Jack/Byrd. For someone so angry, you see to come to the site quite often and post. On some level, deep down, you must realize you are being taken for a ride by the Klown Krew, and it is coming out in hostility. Not sure why you cannot see the links, virtually everything in the post above is linked to the sources. You should read this link, about Section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to understand why it is virtually impossible for Cytodyn to ever get an EUA for severe-to-critical Chinese coronavirus disease and has been, despite management’s claims and that of the touts and promoters, since late October!

    Why do you think loserlimab has saved a single life? There is zero evidence to date that it has saved anyone. Remember that anecdotes from EINDs are not considered evidence, tales about the CEOs Mother-in-law are not evidence, animal studies are not evidence. Finally, the only post on this blog about Dr. Kelly selling shares is this one. We invite you to check the filings for yourself and you will see it is 100% accurate. – Editor]

Leave a Reply to Jack Cancel reply